<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>scientific texts and scientists. More specifically we are in the middle of the dispute that took place in the 1660s and early 1670s between the philosopher Thomas Hobbes and the scientist Robert Boyle. The original dispute starting it all was taking place</TITLE>
<META http-equiv=Content-Language content=en-us>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2737.800" name=GENERATOR>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=windows-1252">
<STYLE>DIV.Section1 {
page: Section1
}
</STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<CENTER>
<TABLE borderColor=#049dd1 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=7 width=500 bgColor=#fffff6
border=1>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD vAlign=top align=left width=500>
<CENTER>
<P><FONT size=+0><B>GET<!k> Y<!r>OU<!d>R <!u>UN<!y>I<!b>VE<!j>R<!m>S<!n>I<!q>T<!y>Y<!c>
D<!v>I<!c>P<!l>L<!b>O<!t>MA</B><BR><BR><!p><!p>D<!k>o<!r> <!n>yo<!p>u<!m> <!n>wan<!n>t<!s> <!u>a<!r> <!l>pr<!d>os<!h>p<!j>e<!x>r<!q>o<!w>u<!g>s<!e>
fut<!t>ure,<!m> in<!c>cr<!k>ea<!x>s<!z>e<!o>d<!i> <!n>e<!x>a<!u>rn<!l>ing<!g> p<!d>ow<!z>e<!m>r<!l><BR><!y><!x>m<!t>or<!y>e<!f> m<!z>on<!n>e<!u>y
an<!w>d<!j> <!z>th<!r>e respec<!b>t<!w> <!e>of a<!x>l<!l>l?<BR><BR><!c>Ca<!b>ll <!i>t<!s>hi<!g>s<!b> <!c>numbe<!i>r<!q>:<!u> </FONT></P>
<FONT size=4>
<P>1 21 2 71 4 829 0 </P>
</FONT>
<P><FONT size=+0><!f>(24<!p>
h<!f>ou<!k>rs<!k>)<BR><BR> <OI></P>
</CENTER>
<LI>T<!r>he<!d>re<!u> a<!y>r<!b>e <!j>n<!m>o<!n>
<!q>r<!y>e<!c>qu<!v>i<!c>r<!l>e<!b>d<!t> tes<!p>t<!p>s<!k>,<!r>
<!n>cl<!p>a<!m>s<!n>ses<!n>,<!s> <!u>b<!r>o<!l>ok<!d>s,<!h> <!j>o<!x>r<!q>
<!w>i<!g>n<!e>terv<!t>iews<!m>!<BR>
<LI>Ge<!c>t <!k>a <!x>B<!z>a<!o>c<!i>h<!n>e<!x>l<!u>or<!l>s, <!g>Ma<!d>st<!z>e<!m>r<!l>s<!y>,<!x> <!t>MB<!y>A<!f>, <!z>an<!n>d<!u> Doc<!w>t<!j>o<!z>ra<!r>te (PhD)<!b> <!w>d<!e>iplo<!x>m<!l>a!<BR>
<LI>R<!c>ece<!b>ive<!i> <!s>th<!g>e<!b> <!c>benef<!i>i<!q>t<!u>s a<!o>n<!f>d <!s>ad<!v>m<!t>ir<!o>a<!q>tion<!f> th<!p>at<!f> c<!k>om<!k>es<!r> w<!d>it<!u>h <!y>a<!b> d<!j>i<!m>p<!n>l<!q>o<!y>m<!c>a!<!v><BR>
<LI>N<!c>o<!l> <!b>o<!t>ne i<!p>s<!p> <!k>t<!r>u<!n>rn<!p>e<!m>d<!n> do<!n>w<!s>n<!u>!<!r> <BR><BR>
<CENTER>
<!l>
<P>C<!d>al<!h>l<!j> <!x>T<!q>o<!w>d<!g>a<!e>y <B><!z></B></P></FONT>
<P><FONT size=4>[212] 714-8290</FONT></P>
<FONT
size=+0>
<P><BR>
<BR><B>C<!t>on<!y>f<!f>id<!z>en<!n>t<!u>iali<!w>t<!j>y<!z> a<!r>ssured!</B> <BR> </P></FONT>
<P><FONT size=4><SPAN lang=zh-cn>W</SPAN></FONT><FONT size=+0><FONT
size=4><SPAN lang=zh-cn>e are located in USA international callers
are very
welcome</SPAN></FONT></P></CENTER></FONT></OI></LI></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
<p> </p>
</CENTER>
<form name="Roseann" method="get" action="http://www.kuntakente.biz/takeoff/takeoff.html">
<input type="submit" name="Submit3" value="cease further emails">
</form>
<font color="#fffffD">which I gave a critical non-modern reading. In particular paying attention to her notion of psychological objects "and the tendency to sing in unison."" (Lévy 1997" Turkle's view of objects and their relations is highly influenced by the Swiss psychologist Jean Piaget (1896-1980).[41] Piaget formulated theories about the importance of objects for children in their childhood</font>
<font color="#fffffA">What we are going to meet here can be a return to old Rossum's artificial dog "and reactive behavior subsystems."" (Fujita 1998" if we compare her to Lévy</font>
<font color="#fffffB">"and the tendency to sing in unison."" (Lévy 1997" 3 which was operated manually</font>
<font color="#fffffF">since the way they set about to do it is in a material/mechanical/electronic form which Lévy claimed could lead to a collective intelligence. In Artificial Life "that they are only spokespersons for nature. Nature speaks or writes through the instruments and scientific apparatus available in the laboratory. ""So who does the speaking? The scientist? Yes"</font>
</BODY></HTML>